Alexander Howard wrote a tremendous overview of the situation, from the recent history of open government platforms to the less-than-perfect implementation of those platforms to the implications of having their funding cut from $34 million to $2 million.
He quoted some of NPP’s numbers that try to put $32 million in context. In terms of the Federal budget, it’s a tiny sum of money–.0009% of the proposed FY11 spending.
That’s an interesting figure, but even if $32 million is just a drop in the bucket, that’s not to say we should spend it carelessly. I’m new to the open government scene, but you don’t have to dig too far into Data.gov to realize it’s far from perfect. Howard’s primer provides some insight into the perverse incentives behind quirks like datasets split up by geography and agencies that don’t publish their juicy stuff.
But consider another number we published: $32 million is 7.7% of the amount that the government spent processing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests in FY10.
A compelling story would be to find out what types of FOIA requests could be serviced via the Data.gov suite of sites. Even better, why not use these requests to prioritize the data that’s released online?
If we can use $32 million to take a bite out of that $416+ million FOIA bill*, why not pursue that investment?
Some of my colleagues would say because it’s not about the money—it’s about policy. As a developer, I have a hard time wrapping my brain around that. Policy? Why wouldn’t our elected officials just make decisions that are logical?
It seems I have much to learn.
*figure pulled from FOIA.gov/data.